![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
| Earl Mardle's Journal Thursday, January 9th, 2003 |
After losing out to the DeCSS case in Norway, it looks like the Music Biz is starting to understand its new reality. "It has got to be accepted that file sharing will always be there just as shoplifting is accepted as wastage in the retail sector." However, at least now they are saying the words, even if they have no idea what that might mean Mr Sherman admitted that the only response to illegal peer-to-peer services was to promote "legal, attractive alternatives that will make consumers want to pay for their music". For a quick check of what music buyers actually want, Geeknews central suggests; 1. Be able to pay and download only the songs I want at a reasonable price 2. Be able to order a custom CD with just the songs I want 3. Be able to RIP the CD purchased in item 2 so that I can put it on my Home PC, Laptop,PDA or MP3 Player. 4. Full disclosure on how much money the artist is getting from the sale. 5. CD cost pennies to press I should not have to pay $19.95 for a CD containing 1 song that made it into the billboard Top 100. You can add you own suggestions here More thoughtful consideration of the topic on the Economist, gues what, cutting the cost is a better deal than making unhackable encryption, but then, the Econmist only pretends to understand economics, how would they have a clue about the terminal weirdness that is the entertainment religion? post a comment |
|
||||||||||||||||||||