![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
| Earl Mardle's Journal Saturday, January 4th, 2003 |
I have long thought that a significant source of profit is the marginal cost of ignorance. I will tend to buy a good at the lowest price I can achieve consistent with the marginal cost of finding a lower price still. If I can get a 10% discount on a $100 transaction by opening a leaflet I will probably do that; if I can gain another 2% by spending 2 hours driving round every store in town to compare prices, I probably wont bother. In other words, the marginal cost of the extra knowledge exceeds my expectation of the potential saving and the surplus value of that ignorance goes into the retailer's pocket who offers me the fastest way to the optimum saving. While accepting in an ideal world that the truth should be the rock on which the norms of civilised behaviour are built, Campbell's judgment is: "For better or worse, lying, untruth, is not an artificial deviant or dispensable feature of life." If he is right, we can press the delete button on "Always tell the truth" and insert Campbell's pronouncement that society has evolved to the point where it "can no longer survive on a diet as thin and meagre as the truth". Reviewer Jonathan Aitken, a convicted perjurer, tends to disagree, saying that "Although we live in an age in which lies can go half way round the world before the truth has got its boots on, truth still matters and often conquers. Moreover, truth will out in the end". Which is almost certainly true and much more likely with an active Internet, but it misses the point that, by the time the truth comes out, the profit is nicely stashed in some theoretically untouchable haven while the miscreant, provided they have bought enough influence with the ill-gotten gains, may suffer some inconvenience, but is unlikely ever to suffer the appropriate sanctions for the crime. No-one in their right mind is betting that Kenny Boy lay or Andrew Fastow for a start will see even one day inside the choky. For another perspective on the long tendrils of trust and their importance in operating communities, check A world without trust; Charles Moore on what we can do to restore confidence in our institutions and each other. What he points to is the emergence of exactly the opposite result from the bureaucratic and defined processes to ensure compliance, transparency and accountability. Also known as the law of unintended consequences. 1 comment | post a comment |
|
||||||||||||||||||||